Sunday, September 28, 2008

Two Items

  • Item 1: This country's nearly 30-year old ban on offshore oil drilling is set to expire on October 1 unless Congress votes to extend it.
  • Item 2: The ban on finalizing leasing regulations for oil shale development on public lands expires on October 1 unless Congress re-imposes it.

Two items which are barely on our radar screens what with all the hubbub over debates and bailouts, but both have huge environmental implications for the coming years. Will congress act? No. Not before the election. They're waiting to see what can be done under a new administration. They're also afraid to piss off voters.

But which administration will it be? More importantly, will it make a difference? I may be wrong, but I think it's highly unlikely that next year congress, or a new president, will have the will and the foresight to re-impose these bans. If the door is opened to offshore drilling and oil shale extraction it will more than likely stay open. Big Oil will win yet again, and nobody will have the balls to stand up to them. But like I said, maybe I'm wrong. I sure as hell hope so. Here's Earthjustice on oil shale:

  • Even the most advanced oil shale technology will create 20-45% more global warming pollution per gallon of gasoline compared to conventional gasoline. The cruder approaches that rely on strip mining shale will generate twice as much carbon dioxide per gallon as gasoline.
  • Oil shale removal will require vast quantities of water -- up to 300 million gallons a day -- in a drought-parched West that has barely enough to sustain agriculture, cattle raising and human consumption. That's at least 3 to 5 gallons of water for every gallon of gasoline produced.
  • It could also destroy up to two million acres of prime wildlife habitat that supports economies throughout Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.

I guess that's the way the game is going to be played. Drill baby, drill. Dig baby, dig. Get that oil any way we can, whether it's the right thing to do or not, and damn the consequences. Jesus...

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Quick Notes And Updates

Here's a quick couple of changes for those three or four of you who regularly check in on these pages that I so diligently craft.

This blog is switching to it's own domain name. It's staying on blogger for the time being, but the address will be buzztail.net instead of buzztail.blogspot. Blogger should automatically re-direct all links, but just in case, there's where you need to go.

For the past year-and-a-half I've also done a sister site on blogger featuring photography and such. Though it isn't going defunct, I am moving my photography related stuff to a new site. I've always liked the simplicity of working with the drag and drop features of blogger -- that's an important consideration for a fumble-fingered computer klutz like me, but I've wanted something with a few more features and more versatility for quite a while now. The problem has been finding something that I could actually figure out how to use. I think I found one, and I'm trying out a site here. The bare bones are up and running, including a blog. More on that elsewhere.

And just in case you haven't heard, Wulfgar! marked his fifth year as a Montana blogger. Five years! Holy shit! No wonder he's so ornery...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Get 'Em Outside

I just read a recent article in the Missoula Independent titled 'Leave No Child Inside' which reports on what's being called nature-deficit disorder, and it really strikes a chord with me. Our kids are losing touch with the natural world at an alarming rate. They spend less than half the time in direct contact with nature on average than kids did even 20 years ago. Whether you want to call this a disorder or not, and I'm uneasy about that because it seems like every time we label something a 'disorder' someone develops and markets a drug that supposedly makes it all better, this lack of contact and lack of connection to our natural habitat can only be detrimental to a kid. Sure, there are a lot of websites to teach kids about nature, and there are several shows on cable and satellite TV, and there are countless publications and books with fine articles and photographs that provide a glimpse of wildness, but they're not the real deal. It's much like going into a restaurant and studying the pictures of the items on the menu but not eating any of them. You may be able to memorize them all, but unless you actually partake you still leave hungry. You can't eat a picture.

I've said it before, but I was very lucky growing up. I spent a great deal of time living with my grandparents in the wilds of northern Minnesota. It wasn't what we now call wilderness, there was no Wilderness Act in place yet and the area certainly wasn't pristine and untouched, but back in the 50's and early 60's it was still quite remote. My days were spent outdoors. I'd wake up in the morning and out the door I'd go, and except for coming in to grab an occasional bite to eat I stayed there until it got too dark to see. Sometimes I didn't even come in then.

I was a busy kid. My time was spent swimming in the lake or catching a few fish for dinner (my grandparents had little money -- we ate wild much of the time) or picking wild berries with my grandpa or roaming the woods talking to bears or moose. I grew up around bears, and never even knew they could be dangerous until someone told in school. Most of the time I ran barefoot. My feet were as tough as truck tires and I could walk on anything. Not like now, when even walking on bread crumbs barefoot feels like I'm walking on a bed of nails. We do get soft.

I spent time in the Twin Cities too, going to school and other such nonsense, but my head and my heart were always up north in the lake country. It was misery being cooped up for months with little contact with the wild. My bedroom became sort of a small natural history museum. I would draw pictures of wild scenes, build little displays with them, and populate them with models of wild animals. I needed to surround myself with what was important and familiar to me until I was set free again. Needless to say, that upbringing influenced my entire life.

I'm still like that. I'm not some kind of robo-man who functions well in captivity, but I'm doing it. Due to circumstances over the last several years I haven't been able to get out much. No need to bore with too many details, but divorce, health problems, and the resulting employment and money issues all hit at once and took a toll. I was homeless for the first half of this decade. I haven't had a car in years that I've dared drive past the city limits. I do have years of photographs I'm working with, but it's just not the same. True, they represent my own experiences and trigger many fine memories, but they're not the same as the real thing. Things are turning around though -- I have a reasonably good income, a place to live, my health is pretty good again, and I have a kid who keeps me hopping. I even have a new car. A good new car. One that I can actually go places with. I don't drive much, but it's good knowing that if I want to get out to the mountains, or maybe more importantly get my daughter out to the mountains, I can do it.

Which brings me back to the original point of this post. This one got a bit windy on me. I didn't intend to write an autobiography here, but it does tie in with my feelings on this. I was glad to see that the House of Representatives passed the No Child Left Inside Act (HR3036) last week, which is designed to provide kids with more environmental education in the classroom as well as more actual hands-on learning experiences out in nature. That's a good thing. Kids need that. We all need that. Food may feed the body, and learning may feed the mind, but all of that needs to be rounded out with direct contact with the wild to feed the spirit. Experiencing wild nature, and getting to know all that is part of it with us provides a spiritual connection to our natural home that kids need for their well-being, and to become fully functioning, fully alive human beings. Yeah -- kids need that, and we as their parents need to see to it that they get it.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Low-Lifes In High Places

The Baca National Wildlife Refuge. Could be you've never heard of it. It's the newest refuge in Colorado and sits in the shadow of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains. It's also been coveted by the oil and gas industry for several years, especially by Lexam Inc., a Canadian energy firm.

Lexam is so eager to get drilling rights to Baca, and apparently the Interior Department is so eager to grant them, that Lexam's lawyers were allowed to oversee the environmental impact studies of drilling in the refuge and improperly influence them according to a press release from PEER.

Here's a few of the low points:

“The Interior Department is once again acting like a wholly owned subsidiary of the oil industry,” said PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, pointing to recent reports of Interior staff partying and sleeping with oil lobbyists. “These documents provide the inside view of how supposedly objective reviews are manipulated and skewed by those who stand to profit.”

The documents show that:
  • Handwritten notes on internal drafts, presumably made by a lawyer in the Interior Solicitor’s office, emphatically directed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service not to assess the drilling impacts of Lexam’s proposed drilling plan. “NO!!! The drilling is not part of the proposed action!!”;
  • DOI attorney Thomas Graf invited Lexam to limit the scope of the Environmental Assessment’s analysis to avoid inconvenient conclusions made by USFWS biologists regarding environmental impacts and lack of information regarding these;
  • Interior officials held meetings with industry attorneys and Thomas Sansonetti, a former top attorney in the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice from 2001-2005, whose role has not been disclosed by the government;
  • Lexam attorney David Bailey advised officials to eliminate discussion of the cumulative impacts of drilling on the refuge;
  • Lexam’s attorney handpicked industry consultant ENSR to conduct the study;
  • DOI attorney Thomas Graf instructed the consultant to not consider the potential impact of long-term development if exploratory wells found natural gas;
  • Graf sent internal drafts to Bailey and others to line-edit the environmental assessment; and
  • Graf and Bailey discussed how to circumvent public comment on the study.

I do declare -- this current version of the Department of the Interior is without a doubt one of the sleaziest gangs of low-lifes this country of ours has yet seen.

You can read the PEER release right here.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

It's Not Over Yet

Will public roadless lands be protected under federal rule? Yes? No? Maybe? Well, it's not over yet...